Safety & Accident

Aluminum F-150 Named IIHS Top Pick

July 30, 2015

Photo courtesy of IIHS.
Photo courtesy of IIHS.

Ford's 2015 F-150 crew cab model has been named a Top Safety Pick by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, while the extended cab model was rated as good by the group.

This spring, Ford's aluminum-body F-150's three cab configurations, including the regular cab model, achieved 5-Star ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The 2015 F-150 crew cab, called the SuperCrew, earned good ratings in all five assessments performed by the insurance industry group, including small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraint evaluations. The vehicle is not eligible for the institute's Top Safety Pick+ award because it lacks an autonomous braking system.

The F-150 extended cab (SuperCab) earned good ratings in four of the five evaulations. The institute gave it a marginal rating for occupant protection in a small overlap front crash test. The institute usually only evaluates the top-selling model, which is the F-150 crew cab, but added the extended cab model due to its high volume of sales.

In the small overlap test, an F-150 travels 40 mph toward a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier. The test replicates what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with another vehicle or an object such as a tree or a utility pole. In this test on the F-150 exteded cab, intruding structure seriously compromised the driver's survival space, resulting in a poor structural rating, according to the institute.

The IIHS also analyzed repair costs because damage to aluminum body parts can be more complicated and pricier to repair than steel, the Highway Loss Data Institute has found.

The institute ran crash tests at 10 mph with the 2015 F-150 crew cab and its 2014 steel-bodied predecessor. Engineers crashed the front left corner of the aluminum pickup into the right rear corner of the steel pickup at a 15 percent overlap, and then flipped the test and ran the steel pickup into the back of the aluminum one.

In both test scenarios, the aluminum F-150 had more extensive damage than the steel model. Total repair costs for the front and rear damage combined were 26 percent higher for the aluminum F-150. Extra time to repair the aluminum body accounted for the higher price to fix frontal damage, while higher parts costs pushed up the repair bill for the rear damage, according to the institute.

Ford disagrees with the institute's assessment on repair costs, the company said in a release.

"Ford’s view is based on real-world accident repair data," according to Ford. "In fact, real-world repair costs on the new 2015 Ford F-150 average $869 less than last year’s F-150 model, according to Assured Performance, an independent body shop certification company that works with leading automakers."


  1. 1. Larry [ August 05, 2015 @ 06:15AM ]

    This is a pretty sad result from the new aluminum F150. I am sure buyers will think again about the aluminum bodies vs the steel by other manufacturers.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 10000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Fleet Management And Leasing

Jack Firriolo from Merchants will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Public Fleet Tracking And Telematics

Amin Amini from Verizon Connect will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Fuel Management

Bernie Kanavagh from WEX will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Recent Topics

Hello to all the members I am checking to see if anyone is using a company for GPS/AVL called Fleet Complete (AT&T)? I would like to...

View Topic

Hi everyone, don't forget to cast your votes for the Public Fleet Hall of Fame! Three industry veterans will be inducted this year, and...

View Topic

Fleet Documents

1134 Fleet Documents (and counting) to Download!

Sponsored by

Cloud Computing is typically a synonym for Software as a Service (SaaS), where computing power, and an application, exist outside the client’s network, hosted somewhere on the Internet, behind the service provider’s firewalls.

Read more