Austin Responds to Fleet Audit Claiming Waste

November 28, 2016

Photo courtesy of GM
Photo courtesy of GM

The City of Austin (Texas) Fleet defended itself after a special report from the Auditor’s Office stated that the fleet had wasted $45,000 in purchasing an incorrect vehicle.

The auditor’s office investigated fleet after it received an allegation of waste and misuse during a 2014 vehicle acquisition process. The report found that a fleet spec writer had requested an incorrect vehicle for the police department. The error was not caught by management, and the spec writer confirmed the incorrect model when the vendor called to make sure the correct vehicle was being ordered.

Fleet didn’t realize it had ordered the wrong vehicle until it arrived at the “make-ready” facility. Returning it would cost $10,000, so Fleet Services Director Gerry Calk decided to keep the vehicle in fleet services for department use. The report also claims that fleet staff modified records related to the assignment of the vehicle before providing them to auditors.

In his response to the report, Calk wrote that he did not agree that the fleet wasted $45,000. He said it had been a simple administrative error (ordering an LS instead of an LT), and fleet will recover the cost when the vehicle is assigned to a similar service application. In the meantime, fleet will continue to use the vehicle for administrative and motor pool needs.

He also said “the characterization of gross inefficiency is not reflective of the true situation.” This occurred at the time of significant personnel turnover and reflects an administrative error of one employee. However, to address the problem, fleet added two more verification points to the current purchasing process and is working on adding one final verification step with the Purchasing Office. Fleet management also counseled the two staff members who auditors said did not fully cooperate in the investigation.

A replacement vehicle will be purchased in the 2017 fiscal year to make up for the accidental purchase, while the Police Department continues to use its old vehicle.


  1. 1. Dave Masinter [ December 02, 2016 @ 08:57AM ]

    I found this article listed as a top 5 for the week to be really a waste unless that is the point. This story gets sent nationwide about a $45,000 mis-orderd vehicle that can and will still be used in the fleet. The Austin fleet has a $67,000,000 dollar budget. Someone internally reported it for "whatever" (hmmm, do I smell someone with an ax to grind?) reason to the auditor's office which probably spent another $100,000 investigating it to justify their jobs not to mention what it cost fleet services to respond to it. This comment of course is based only upon what I've read here and 30 years experience working with fleets.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 10000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Fleet Management And Leasing

Jack Firriolo from Merchants will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Public Fleet Tracking And Telematics

Amin Amini from Verizon Connect will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Fuel Management

Bernie Kanavagh from WEX will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Recent Topics

Hello to all the members I am checking to see if anyone is using a company for GPS/AVL called Fleet Complete (AT&T)? I would like to...

View Topic

Is anyone experiencing the following issue with their Ford Police Interceptors with the Ecoboost engine - after long periods of idling...

View Topic

Fleet Documents

1134 Fleet Documents (and counting) to Download!

Sponsored by

An agreement whereby in a closed-end lease, usually a full maintenance one, as a strategic commitment to the concept of true partnering with the customer, the leasing company makes all components of the rental calculation known to the lessee.

Read more